Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Citybus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Withdrawn as If this were to be deleted then we may aswell cull every barely notable bus article here!. →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  23:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Glasgow Citybus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable bus company fails WP:CORP (Had prodded but AfD's quicker with decisions). Also Merge may be a better solution? ... Davey 2010  T  00:47, 15 October 2013
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 01:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 01:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Granted an operator that hasn't done much in its 14 years, but with 10 routes & 48 buses, and a reported acquisition of 30 route Henderson Travel (36 buses @ April 2010) (cites still pending), not insignificant.Mo7838 (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Continued acquisitions isn't a reason for it to be kept, The company has no history whatsoever -


 * Although merging may be a better solution? Davey 2010  T  17:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.