Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Tigers Junior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:35, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Glasgow Tigers Junior
This caught my attention while categorizing articles beginning with the letter G. It appears to be a non-notable flag football association of some sort, with 10 unique hits on Google. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 07:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete nn-club, makes no assertion of notability, tagging as such -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 07:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I have removed the speedy tag. This is a sports club playing in a league, and that is probably an assertion of notability by itself. No vote. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Valid speedy, I would say, pretty much all amateur football clubs play in leagues, most of which are utterly non-notable (I would say regular television coverage of the league would be a minimum for notability). A football club wouldn't have much reason to exist if it didn't play in a league. --Malthusian (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Question How does one handle a copyvio on AFD? The material is quite blatantly lifted from  and . NickelShoe 15:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Just tag it is a copyvio. Blank the article, and replace it with . That will expand to a tag which gives you instructions for adding an entry at Copyright problems. Then just say at the AFD that it has been tagged. Two things can then happen when the AFD closes:
 * If there was a consensus to delete anyway, it will be deleted through AFD.
 * If there is not a consensus to delete, the article will stay until the copyright process runs its course, giving the contributor a chance to explain (perhaps the contributor owns the copyright). Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, tagged as copyvio. NickelShoe 15:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.