Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow University Students' Representative Council

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus, defaulting to "keep." Joyous 00:20, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

Glasgow University Students' Representative Council
Non-notable, apparently average college student council--134 hits. Niteowlneils 20:54, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no eveidence of notability. If anybody wants to merge into Glasgow University that's fine by me. --fvw *  23:26, 2005 Jan 28 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough. Megan1967 01:06, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. More than notable enough. --Centauri 03:19, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously not notable enough. Gamaliel 04:00, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The case for the notability of Glasgow University Students' Representative Council is far weaker than those for Glasgow University Union and Queen Margaret Union, in part because of the limited scope of the institution makes there very little to be said about it in its own right. Unlike the other two, this article could be merged into University of Glasgow (from which it sprung due to a dangling hyperlink).  Weak Keep verging upon Merge with Redirect. Uncle G 15:36, 2005 Jan 29 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge and redirect for the reasons given by Uncle G. / up+land 16:05, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. In my opinion, reasonably large and/or old student councils and students' unions merit their own articles, and this one has been around for 118 years. Alarm 17:37, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Less than notable enough. Jayjg (talk)  03:36, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Student groups at universities are generally not notable, and this one conforms to that general rule. --BM 18:11, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Prefer delete but I'll live with redirect (which is more likely to prevent the article from reappearing). Rossami (talk) 23:05, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article doesn't mislead about it's subject's notability, and it looks like a legitimate separate topic. dbenbenn | talk 21:06, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.