Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glass pollution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The source mentioned by Margin1522 is, for future reference.  Sandstein  09:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Glass pollution

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication on how glass pollution is inherently notable, and since no other articles link to it, it doesn't seem like it is notable. Chipka (talk) 05:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 9.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 06:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Notability is established by reliable secondary sources, not wikilinks. The reference in article is valid and there are certainly more to be had on this topic.  Perhaps redirection to Glass Recycling or Litter. Vrac (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 15:34, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – It does have a good cite, which should be added to Glass recycling. The remainder is an unsourced essay. I think the author should work on improving Glass recycling. (Most of the hits I found for "glass pollution" were about pollution of glass by foreign materials during manufacture.) – Margin1522 (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.