Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasses Direct (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 19:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Glasses Direct
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's time for another AfD because the listed sources in 2013 still are not the substantial and significant coverage needed, it's also still questionable for independent notability. My PROD:"None of the listed sources suggest the needed substantial significant coverage and my own searches have found only trivial links, including searches at major British news sources.". SwisterTwister  talk  21:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not only does it not meet WP:CORP but there are some potentially libelous statements such as: " Murray Wells accused Perkins of rigging the election." Also, the sentences that start "I is important to reiterate..." and "I quote" are indicative that this article does not adhere to NPOV and may even be a bit of a hit piece. LaMona (talk) 02:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - blatantly contravenes WP:NPOV and also fails WP:CORP. Tom29739 [ talk ] 22:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.