Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasvegas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Non-Admin Closure. Tiddly -  Tom  07:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Glasvegas

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not sure if it fails WP:CSD or not. The user who created this article says that the band is notable (Talk:Glasvegas). Since the speedy deletion was contested, that is why I am bringing it here.  Gl ac ier   Wo lf   23:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Look at the sources - the article is very notable. Over time the community will fill it up with information that is already out there and I'm sure Glasvegas will become even more notable as 2008 moves along. It would be a disaster if Glasvegas got deleted as the band is indeed wikipedia-worthy. User:Johnthepcson
 * Weak keep but expand and source. They have a profile on the BBC's web site which gives them some semblance of notability in Britain. Redfarmer (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The group's getting rave reviews from the BBC, NME, and The Guardian. They've made plenty enough of a splash to pass WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Mentioned in reliable sources. Lurker  (said · done) 15:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources clearly prove that Glasvegas is notable. User:humjosh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.201.36 (talk) 18:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.