Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glauco Della Sciucca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Glauco Della Sciucca

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article about unnotable person, after seeing no relevant news about him. Alexius08 (talk) 14:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I cannot tell from the fractured English in the article which claims of notability refer to the named individual and which to people he knows. It reads like a personal blog written by a person with little knowledge of English. That would be remediable by editing, if there are multiple reliable and independent sources with substantial coverage of the individual, rather than the "he worked on this," "he met this person," "the New York Public Library has a copy of his wonderful book" kind of mentions. Might or might not Does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO. The refs are mostly to sites selling the book. Google News archive has zero results for him. His book of short stories, in Italian, is apparently held by 9 libraries in the U.S. He writes for the "New York Review of Books" and "The New Yorker" per . Writing a book of unknown success and working as a writer/artist do not in themselves satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - This article is a mess. Appears to have been written by the subject. As Edison noted, the English is broken, thus it is not easy to even distinguish between claims to notability and information regarding other people. Search for sources disappoints, thus we can't write a decent article from sources. Fails WP:BIO. لenna  vecia  05:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.