Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glebos Tkachenko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 01:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Glebos Tkachenko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NARTIST. All I can find are passing mentions in some foreign press. Mostly mentioning that one of his pieces is present somewhere. There is no coverage about him. J bh Talk  15:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  15:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  15:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  15:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I think the references are out there, but they're largely in other languages. A brief search turns up enough independent mentions to establish notability, along with numerous significant show mentions (biennales etc). The article itself needs to be cut down substantionally, and properly referenced.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 20:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant WP:AUTOBIO. this is simply a listing of where he has exhibited. Sorely lacking major awards or significant third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 16:29, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are no actual permanent collections which would've been needed for convincing notability. SwisterTwister   talk  20:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.