Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gleemax (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Gleemax
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination for an IP editor, whose rationale (from Talk:Gleemax) is included verbatim below. The first AFD was closed in June 2007 as a redirect to Unhinged, though that article does not mention this subject at all at present. The redirect was undone three weeks later, as a result of discussion at Talk:Unhinged (Magic: The Gathering). So we know that this existed, which is good as far as it goes, but I'm not seeing any sort of reliable sourcing that discusses its impact or notability. I usually don't opine when I complete someone else's nomination, but this has sat for a good long while with little prospect of improvement. With no good options for a redirect or a merge, I think deletion is our best option at this point. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Nominating for deletion because this is a small footnote in the history of Wizards of the Coast and doesn't need a dedicated article. The website never even made it out of the alpha stage and there is little to no coverage from third party sources (the article has been tagged with this problem for the last 7 years). 37.228.231.1 (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or redirect if this is best again as my searches found nothing better than some of the currently listed links at browser and some more at Highbeam...but nothing to suggest better notability and improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 18:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   18:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.