Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glemo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  00:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Glemo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. This is a neologism for an art form created by "James & Fabian" in 2005. No sources or claim of notability. Dave 6 talk 08:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertisement. By the way, you know it's bad when the first Google hit it Urban Dictionary. Punkmorten 08:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Some people might think it worse when it's wikipedia which is first. Cloveoil 05:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability for this "movement". --Selket Talk 09:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable neologism. In addition, the article does not attribute the sources used to compile the information within the article. Kyra~(talk) 09:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Kyra. Does not even have a definition in Urban Dictionary Jules 12:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.