Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen A. Staples


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 10:59, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Glen A. Staples

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Only ref is a You-Tube video. WP:OR WP:NOTE. The Eskimo (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. I'm not convinced this can be tipped all the way to a speedy delete under criterion A7, but I don't see any assertion of significance beyond being bishop of a megachurch, and not every pastor is notable. —C.Fred (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - per C.Fred's impeccable reasoning. ukexpat (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * A church of 14,000 might be notable, but (if so) we would need an article on it, before we had one on its presiding pastor ("bishop"). Accordingly, delete unless notability is proved during AFD period.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable pastor, if church is notable, give article for the church but pastor is not notable.  "Call me fart fart.  Toot toot!"  108.111.28.91 (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.