Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Ard Abbey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @185  · 03:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Glen Ard Abbey

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No idea what the regulations are for abbies, but this seems completely !WP:N. -Zeus-u 01:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spammy, doesn't indicate any notability whatsoever. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Religious buildings/organisations aren't inherently notable and the article makes no claim sufficient to defeat WP:MILL or a found a claim of notability per WP:N. Good faith Google searches turn up no relevant hits whatsoever. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources.  Anna Lincoln  12:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I disagreed with this being CSD, but I admit that AfD 'delete' is reasonable - having tried to source it, and failing to do so. I hoped their might be sources for the building, but I agree that presently there is no content to support a claim of notability. Smappy (talk) 18:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not spammy to me, but distinctly lacking in indications of notability. 0 ghits outside the Wikipedia area. I am intrigued by the idea of Celtic Buddhism, but not enough to dig further. Peridon (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I tried to clean it up a bit so it was no so much of a mess.  Then I tried various searches, including Bing.  I literally found nothing except this stub and their website.  Fails WP:V. Bearian (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.