Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Echo Park, Ontario


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Discussion closed after being up at AfD for 11 days. Bearian (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Glen Echo Park, Ontario

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This was a private naturist park that has since been closed, and not a government-run "protected area". No indication or evidence of notability. Prodded, and prod was disputed.  PK T (alk)  17:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can't see anything to indicate there is significant coverage of this.  What it was, or whether it is open or closed currently, is a non-issue.  The issue is there is no significant coverage of this entity, as explained at WP:N.  -- Jayron  32  17:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. "Coverage" may be the wrong word to use since it's about a nudist colony, but in fact Google and Google News turn up a number of articles about this facility in major Canadian media over a number of years, such as .  It's in the wrong category, for sure.--Arxiloxos (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  —Arxiloxos (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Good work, Arxiloxos!  PK  T (alk)  13:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - sourcing shows that this facility meets notability through coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:49, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: based on notability being shown by coverage.--Milowent • talkblp-r 06:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.