Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glendon Swift


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Glendon Swift

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no reason why this shouldn't be viewed as a WP:BLP1E. I don't think it is an exception under WP:PERP. In the end, he just made some harassing phone calls to a notable person. Any coverage I see of him is related to the 1E Niteshift36 (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Federal Case. In Connection with a high profiled member of the US Gov. is relevant. Keep, especially, knowing that Cantor was the victim of many harrassments (especially in connection to his jewishreligion faith) it appears that even on WP many users go against. Keep as this was a federal case, and even Swift has been convicted to a modest term (13 months). Antisemite Criminals on theats (murder or a simple harrassment(s)) should always kept due to the fact, that people who threat poliltians in that way (killing your wife & raping your child) are threats not only against a specific high profile person, but a threat towards everyone. But most important are this antisemite hate in such comments towards any human being, especially knowing that D-Day has been on its 70 year commemoration a few days ago. However, Federal Cases in the WP-Project have always Priority, nomatter what any individual might mi(s(s))belief. Keep. -- Gary   Dee  20:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Based on your response here and in other discussions, you seem impressed with the idea of something having a federal charge or a federal officer being involved. You really need to read WP:BLP1E and WP:N first because federal charges won't satisfy either of those policies. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:BLP1E. EricSerge (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Reliable sources cover him only in the context of an otherwise non-notable event and he is otherwise not notable. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 21:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. BLP1E with no biographical depth. Not a notable criminal act. RS coverage is strictly routine: arrest, guilty plea and sentencing. No trace of RS interest beyond that. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fits perfectly into WP:BLP1E guidelines.Z10987 (talk) 01:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per notable only for a single event. Event is also non-notable as run-of-the-mill for those holding public office. Philg88 ♦talk 05:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Gary   Dee  15:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Huh? You can't !vote both ways Gary. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Huh? Huh? Its Halloween. Huh? Who? DELETE. --88.207.190.206 (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC) - Sorry i did not login. -- Gary   Dee  01:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the nom.  This is definitely a case of BLP1E, and it serves no purpose to our readers to document one criminal act by a non-notable person.  In the grand scheme of crime, politics, and antisemitism in the U.S., this is trivial. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.