Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glendy B. Arnold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, default to keep. I considered relisting this one, but it's been running for two weeks, and it's not like there's much ongoing discussion. Steve Smith (talk) 03:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Glendy B. Arnold

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that she meets WP:GNG, and there is no indication she meets WP:NPOL. Was de-prodded with the comment, "There is an incoming link to this page", which doesn't seem to be a valid rationale to disapprove a prod.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC) ::It is marked as a stub. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Daask (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of fodder for a more extensive article about this gentleman at https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=%22Glendy+B.+Arnold%22&offset=2. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 09:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 09:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 09:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Numerous sources have been added since the article was nominated for AfD. These should be contemplated in the discussion.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 19:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the offices held by the subject are sufficient to meet automatic notability for politicians, and none of his other activities, political or otherwise, reach notability under WP:ANYBIO. While he is mentioned in newspaper sources, the coverage is routine and not particularly significant. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * A three-column article, with illustrations, in a major metropolitan newspaper is not routine. Thanks. https://www.newspapers.com/image/138159868/?terms=%22Glendy%2BB.%2BArnold%22%2Bmarguerite%2Bmartyn. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - Well enough sourced to pass GNG. Historical biography of an American judge. Carrite (talk) 13:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - It would be reassuring to know that the nominator put enough effort into WP:BEFORE to actually get the gender of the subject right. Carrite (talk) 13:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - was not aware that gender was an aspect of either WP:GNG or WP:BEFORE… or perhaps it was a simple type. Nice AGF.   Onel 5969  TT me 21:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.