Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn E. Thomas Dodge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete under Speedy Criteria G10 as an attack page. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Glenn E. Thomas Dodge

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Despite the controversy being notable, I doubt if the actual dealership is notable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * keep the article - if I have interpreted your reason for nomination for deletion correctly, the article needs to be about the controversy, rather than the dealership. Based on this, I have edited the article, and am wondering if it is possible to change its title to 'Auto Enthusiasts of the World Unite: The Glenn. E. Thomas Dodge Controversy'  Thank you. Letthemknowthetruth (talk) 05:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well should the aritcle be kept, then it would be moved to "Glenn E. Thomas Dodge dealership controversy", but fist, let this AFD run its course. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I am satisfied with that. Thank you.Letthemknowthetruth (talk) 05:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Why would you delete this posting? Because it's factual, so I see no reason it should go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.226.116 (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)   — 99.232.226.116 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 


 * KEEP IT!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.255.21.11 (talk • contribs)  — 76.255.21.11 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 


 * Unquestionable Delete - neither the "scandal" nor the dealership are notable. WP is not the venue to publicize complaints about a dealership or lobby for support for a cause.  Stealthy OPED pretending to be an article.   7  23:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep it! This article is about the tremendous power of the Internet and how different web-clubs have joined in on this controversy. Different Car Clubs and other non-automitive type web-clubs have joined the Challengertalk.com website just to voice their opinion; then linked the thread on their own webpages. The response is overwhelming and justifies a spot in Internet history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.72.26 (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)  — 71.171.72.26 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is obviously a blatant attack page, being used by an anonymous disgruntled Ebay bidder with a grudge against a Dodge dealership.  Ebay disputes are probably inherently not notable, and Wikipedia is not for lobbying about them.  The article creator's handle, Letthemknowthetruth, would seem to be significant as well. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have added the attack page speedy delete template to the article, and blanked the text of the page as requested by the template.  The contents remain in history, and probably need to be scrubbed by oversight after deletion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.