Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Murphy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete a7, the assertions in this article don't constitute notability. NawlinWiki 21:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Glenn Murphy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable political activist, POV campaign page, also conflict of interest as one of the editors appears to be a member of the campaign ticket. The individual is not now an officeholder and is not running for any government office, he is just running for the presidency of a political organization. Montco 00:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. Aplomado  talk 00:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * strong delete, see my comment in Articles for deletion/Team Murphy &mdash; BillCtalk 01:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. See my explanation at Articles for deletion/Jessica Colon, which holds here mutatis mutandis. --N Shar 02:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:BIO for notability, WP:V, and probably WP:VANITY. For that matter, WP is not a webhosting service, too. -- MarcoTolo 02:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - vanity, non-notable -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 02:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent reliable sources provided. Fails WP:N, WP:V,WP:BIO. Delete. --Shirahadasha 04:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Dlete. Vanity.  Philippe Beaudette 04:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Running for, or even being elected to, an office within the youth division of a political party is not enough in itself to satisfy WP:BIO. --Metropolitan90 05:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:BIO, WP:V, WP:COI. Terence Ong 10:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources therefore fails WP:V Alf photoman 14:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources to show why they should be on here.SlideAndSlip 20:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.