Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn T. Morris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Glenn T. Morris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article seems to be written by the subject with little or no credible citations to speak of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rightousbob (talk • contribs) 19:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it could use some editing, but there seems to be evident citation. MysterKitty (talk) 20:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Evident citation? I don't think so. There are only two listed citations through out the article, "Fourth World Center For The Study Of Indigenous Law And Politics" and a press release from a Native American activist group. Neither of which can be considered credible sources. Rightousbob —Preceding undated comment added 22:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * True, what I thought would be good sources turned out to be mostly 404 links. I'll prune some of those and see if there's enough info in the remaining links to warrant notability. MysterKitty (talk) 22:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. GS cites are 71,50,26 and not much else. May be not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete at best as the best I'm simply seeing is having the University of Colorado (one of his university workplaces) give their highest award to him, but there's no actual named professorship, library collections or other significant information listed, therefore there's nothing to base a genuinely substantiated article. The fact it also cares to list who his work colleagues are causes questions of named mentions for advertising. SwisterTwister   talk  23:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.