Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenorchy Plaza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Glenorchy Plaza

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails notability - very small shopping centre with one anchor tenant and no independent sources (have checked Google and Factiva). Former PROD but for some reason was lifted. Orderinchaos 19:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Orderinchaos 19:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are trivial, no hope of expansion beyond what's already here. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Even less notable than most of the sub-regional complexes with articles here. Where is the encyclopedic value? -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, some shopping complexes are notable. Not this one though.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC).
 * Indeed. I believe shopping centres can be notable but that a great many are not, and that size and tenants are an indicator. Orderinchaos 08:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, the Chermsides, Fountain Gates and Erina Fairs of the world is where I would draw the line. Brimbank Central Shopping Centre, I don't think so and this one, not even close. -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Brimbank does fall over the line IMO, although its article at present is woeful. It has a GLA of 39,505 sqm and 4 anchors, and I can find sources on it. (Glenorchy Plaza, by comparison, is barely 5000 sqm.) Orderinchaos 15:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.