Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glicaramide (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Glicaramide
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems weird to submit my own article for deletion. It was procedural, based on the discussion here. The threshold for inclusion for chemicals, the notability needed. Glicaramide is not very notable, deleting it or not? RobertMel (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Qualifies for speedy deletion under G7. Ikluft (talk) 03:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I was pretty much fooled by the missing pharmacology list, and the problem with assessing the notability of chemicals. They're more universal than anything else, under a formula a structure etc. -RobertMel (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No harm to have this article hanging around, so long that the data is verifiable and there are at least a few mentions of this compound. WP is not paper. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Change to Keep The article creator and AfD nom was the sole significant editor at the time when I said it qualified for Speedy G7. But with another edit having been made, that is no longer the case. I'll go along with the consensus, which has swayed to keep. Ikluft (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 *  Neutral Keep - I realize it's not very notable, but it is verifiable, and it's not like this is a BLP or an article promoting a non-notable musical group. PDCook (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Although it does not appear to have ever become a marketed drug, the scientific literature suggests glicaramide has been a reference point guiding further research on antidiabetic agents.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.