Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 42


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. After 2 relists, this deletion discussion has no additional support - and it's been asserted that WP:NASTCRIT#2 is met, which is a reasonable argument. (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 10:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Gliese 42

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 05:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Merge to a combined article, possibly on near solar class K stars. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Our galaxy contains billions of stars. Those few hundred which are close enough to be of special interest and study should all have articles. Warden (talk) 09:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The link to the University of Heidelberg reference is not working. Data about the star are noted at SIMBAD (the second reference) under the name LHS 1163. Similar data are provided at NEXXUS 2 under the star's various codenames. The star is mentioned at the Sol Station reference, listed as CD-31 325 A.


 * The point of contention is criterion 2 at WP:NASTCRIT. I do not believe that NEXXUS 2 or SIMBAD are of direct interest to amateur astronomers, nor are they of high historical importance. However Sol Station has a relatively user-friendly interface and fairly simplistic language. I think that Sol Station is of interest to amateurs. Also, Gliese 42 is within 50 light-years of the sun, putting it in a sub-group of 155 K-type stars. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  17:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.