Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 52


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If anyone wants content to merge, contact me. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Gliese 52

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 04:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 05:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Merge to a combined article, possibly on near solar class K stars. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to List of stars in Cassiopeia per WP:NASTRO. We already have a list of nearby stars and this one isn't near enough to be interesting in that respect. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep If it is part of a constellation that suggests to me that it is observable and meets the NASTRO guideline. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merging the star to the List of stars in Cassiopeia also a reasonable outcome. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, huge nitpick here: literally every star is part of a constellation, so that has nothing at all to do with notability. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to appropriate list, or delete. Doesn't satisfy WP:NASTRO, nor WP:GNG. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.