Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 546


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Gliese 546

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. Although there are a fair number of hits on SIMBAD, none of them that I saw appear to actually study the star in question. StringTheory11 (t • c) 15:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. I was unable to find the nontrivial publications about this object required for WP:NASTRO #3 and it doesn't seem to pass any of the other criteria either. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to List of stars in Boötes per WP:NASTHELP: Doesn't satisfy WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. No significant content found in suitable publications. Praemonitus (talk) 23:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 05:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.