Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 546 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:20, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Gliese 546
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing has changed since the last time this article was deleted. The star is still there and still not notable. Too faint, no non-trivial coverage per WP:NASTRO. Lithopsian (talk) 20:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Per nom, and I don't see those reasons changing any time soon, unless Gliese 546 has any plans to the contrary. - Pax  Verbum  04:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another dime-a-dozen red dwarf star with no particularly interesting characteristics and no dedicated scientific studies. Praemonitus (talk) 19:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.