Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gliese 638


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Gliese 638

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. Not visible to the naked eye, and no significant coverage in studies as required. StringTheory11 (t • c) 21:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep for now a suspected variable surely means that something has been written on the star...and its a K star and close. Unusual enough to warrant a page I think. I will try to look for sources later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: Less than you might think; I didn't find much of substance. There were a few hits on "HD 151288", but it was mostly in combined studies. Praemonitus (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.