Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:G7 as the article creator has agreed with deletion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Glise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Currently, the page's only references are a forum and an advertising page on the web site of the company that produce "Glise". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

-

Dear Mr JamesBWatson, I've added only 2 links because the earlier entry of mine was deleted due to "promotion" warning. It was little bit confusing. Thank you for your explanations. I understand your points now. So, I can confirm article deletion as you suggested. Best regards. Codimension (talk) 16:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * By "I can confirm article deletion" do you mean that you agree to have the article deleted? If that is what you mean, then we can close this discussion without taking up any more of editors' time.
 * Meanwhile, since your comment implicitly indicated that the earlier version of the article had more references, I will describe all the references that have been provided, including all those in the version of the article which has been deleted.


 * 1) A forum post.
 * 2) A page on the download site softpedia, where Glise can be obtained.
 * 3) Advertising pages on the websites www.twistednormal.com and www.evermotion.org. I don't know what the relationship is between Twistednormal and Evermotion, but both of them on their web sites refer to development of Glise in the first person (e.g. on www.twistednormal.com "We started coding Glise 6 years ago", and on www.evermotion.org "We just released the latest version of our little neat subsurface 3d modeler, Glise 1.6.") so clearly neither of them is an independent source. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

-

Dear Mr JamesBWatson, yes. I'm agree with deletion. The links you explained have review and version informations. That's why I added them. Thank you for your explanations and all efforts again. Best regards. Codimension (talk) 23:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - As the editor who originally PROD'd the page, which was removed by the page's creator. Meatsgains (talk) 22:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.