Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Allergy Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Global Allergy Network

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable, CSD repeatedly removed by creator, promotional by COI editor. GregJackP  Boomer!   11:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would say that the information given is important. You need to give a chance to the members of the public to present factual information. It may have looked initially as promotional, but in fact at the moment it is just factual. I'm sure that further reviews will improve it. I may guess that  GregJackP  will decide to revise his speedy decision.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.197.42 (talk) 14:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. What does factual have to do with it?  Thus far, it has not shown notability as shown by independent, reliable, verifiable sources.  Providing promotional informational to the public is not the purpose of the project.   GregJackP   Boomer!   17:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable, lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Article written by COI.   red dog six  (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails Notability (organizations and companies) and Verifiability. Arguments for keeping are just "it contains valuable information". Normally I would suggest userfication but if the editors are in a conflict of interest, then no. --Drm310 (talk) 20:26, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.