Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Britain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Global Britain

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of WP:N. Subject appears to fail both WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Unable to find evidence of in depth coverage by multiple independent reliable secondary sources called for in our guidelines. Article also fails WP:V given only a single cited source which was (it's currently a dead link) presumably the org's home page. I will note that it doesn't help that the org's name is currently a widely used phrase or expression in the ongoing Brexit debate which makes it challenging to get search results specific to this particular organization. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - This company seems to be active. One of its directors has his own wiki page, but the other only shows up in company searches. Otherwise, searches show nothing to indicate notability.-Shtove (talk) 13:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  15:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  15:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  15:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  15:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I can not find any references to Global Britain which refer to this company. There are, however, a huge number to the term in general so it is possible something got lost in the noise. That said - Fails GNG, fails NORG. Jbh  Talk  16:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.