Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Cannabinoids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Global Cannabinoids

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Declined G11 (I think it would've been eligible). Fails NCORP - little to no independent coverage. Mainly sourced to press-releases and other promotional pieces. KH-1 (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 06:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 06:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 06:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete I believe this passes WP:GNG, references are good. This business is significant and I see no need to delete the article. GoldMiner24 (talk) 07:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * What do you believe are the WP:THREE best sources? As it stands, it reads too much like an advertisement. Femke (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Looking at this closer, I believe I was wrong. The sources I thought were best were the Business Insider articles as I thought them a reputable source, but actually reading the articles, I doubt that now. I also agree that it fails WP:NPOV. Changing to delete.  GoldMiner24 Talk 13:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find evidence of notability, and the article is so promotional WP:TNT is warranted. Femke (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete A search for reliable coverage about the company comes up empty, otherwise I would suggest keeping and updating. Somb8franko (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.