Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global College International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Global College International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's been five years now, and this advertorial has yet to have anything even pretending to be a reliable source. I appreciate sources may be harder to find for Nepalese institutions than their equivalents in India or Pakistan, but that doesn't absolve the articles of the need for sourcing. I can find no mentions of this institution in any source other than the college's own website for anything other than the most trivial of things such as the fact that they fielded a team in a sports tournament, while some of the material stated as fact in this pseudo-article is straightforward lies (the A Level is not an advanced international degree designed for academically inclined students, it's a certificate for schoolchildren and the Commonwealth equivalent of the US high school diploma, I can find nothing to suggest that it's affiliated to Cambridge University but instead just that it uses Cambridge Assessment International Education's standard exams…) There's no such thing as an automatic right to a Wikipedia article—WP:GNG doesn't give blanket immunity if the sources don't exist, and I can't find anything to suggest that they do. &#8209; Iridescent 17:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  &#8209; Iridescent 17:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. — &thinsp; J 947  [cont] 18:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete we need to stop treating educational corporations as if they are an exception to notability rules. Having read lots and lots of articles on schools, we also need in many cases to have the articles focus more on the broad sweep and history of the instituion and not so much on what it presently looks like and functions like. This is true of many US high schools that have existed over a century but the article mainly lists current sports teams etc.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.