Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Dynamics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Eureka (TV series). this is a redirect so any useful content can be accessed and merged. Tone 14:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Global Dynamics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fictional company that provides no evidence of notability or relevance outside of the television show. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - a major plot device in the series where most of the stories are centered or derived. Article exists as a split from the main article per WP:Summary style, as the article grew beyond a usable size. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 06:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The subject's relation to the plot has no bearing on its encyclopedic significance. Rather, you should base your argument on it having sufficient independent media coverage to merit an article, not some inherent noteworthiness of the topic itself. Even a relatively minor plot element could be notable if it had received enough media or academic attention, while some major elements will invariably fall short for the same reason. Dominic·t 09:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Eureka 118 google news hits for "Global Dynamics" and Eureka. Ikip (talk) 00:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect It can be summed up much easier, without the need for an article. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge to Eureka (TV series) As indicated by Jeremy, Global Dynamics is a major plot device. While it doesn't warrant a separate article the information shouldn't be lost through a deletion or redirect. A summary of the information in this article needs to be included in the Eureka article. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * merge  as specified above. No reason at all given why merge or redirect is unsuitable--probably because there is no conceivable reason, at least for a redirect. The info here is not excessively detailed, and would fit in very nicely. In fact, I think it's needed to adequately explain the show, and would do better there.    DGG ( talk ) 02:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.