Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Force Wrestling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  20:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Global Force Wrestling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As of February 2017, none of the very few taped Amped shows has aired in any format anywhere internationally, with a majority of the talent who worked on the initial tapings having subsequently signed to work for WWE, Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, or Ring of Honor. It only had few irregular non-televised professional wrestling events, then folded like Hulkamania Tour. Even Jacques Rougeau held more and larger professional wrestling events under his "company" named Le spectacle familial Jacques Rougeau, but we didn't create articles for that as it was not deemed enough. Some reliable sources are there because of Jeff Jarret, not GFW.Eliken (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I've been critical of GFW and have nominated all of its forks for deletion, including all of its championships and Amped. I agree with everything you said about GFW but nothing you said justifies deletion. It's a troubled promotion but it passes WP:GNG and that's all that matters here. I'll also note that the Hulkamania tour you cited as an example also has an article.LM2000 (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. LM2000 (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello, thanks for your input! However, GFW is certainly not a "professional wrestling promotion." If anything, it's a series of irregular non-televised events held by Jeff Jarret, like the Hulkamania tour by Hulk Hogan. Some reliable sources are there because of Jeff Jarret, not GFW.--Eliken (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly passes GNG and warrants an article. Averaging over 1,000 hits per day as per Pageview Analysis. Dannys-777 (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per LM2000.  JTP (talk • contribs) 15:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't like GFW. A huge hype, a huge deception. Also, I proposed for deletion various articles (personnel, templates, titles) However, the promotion is notable. Various sources talks about GFW and Jarrett says the promotion stills active. I^hate GFW, but not so much to support the deletion. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've also participated in deletion debates to shut down articles on GFW side topics, but the promotion itself is clearly notable by Wikipedia standards. A hot mess, to be sure, but notable. -- Finngall   talk  15:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per LM2000. (talk page stalker)  Crash Under  ride  15:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The nominator is a notorious sock. As far as I'm concerned, this can be snowkept.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.