Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Gathering 2007


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears that the article cannot stay due to lack of notability, there is no consensus on a merger or redirect. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Global Gathering 2007

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced year version of a festival not even mentioned in the article (Global Gathering). Some spamming too. Seems to fail WP:GNG The Banner talk 15:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The page clearly shows the reference to Global_Gathering_2007, this is a valid article should not be deleted. End. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.69.122 (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * An external link is not a source. Beside that: sources should be independent, conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 18:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge and redirect to Global Gathering. Individual editions of festivals are rarely notable outside of the overall context of the festival - there's likely nothing that can said about this particular festival apart from that year's line-up, and Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a listings directory. Richard3120 (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete individual annual events of this sort are not notable. No point in redirecting--anyone would look in the main article. And the details of the event probably do not not belong there either because they are promotional..  DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 01:50, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete lacking third party significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.