Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Gems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Global Gems

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable per WP:COMPANY, unreferenced, borderline WP:SPAM, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested by anonymous editor. MuffledThud (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —MuffledThud (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per MuffledThud and the fact that it was created by the WP:SPA Blueclown85 as evident from . Smocking (talk) 13:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, article is spam and I can't find notability. Haakon (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It'd be a good candidate for G11. Jclemens (talk) 18:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unreferenced, not notable. WWGB (talk) 00:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.