Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Health Innovative Technology Fund (GHIT)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR) (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 22:58, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Global Health Innovative Technology Fund (GHIT)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources used here are self-published. To meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, third-party sources must be identified to establish WP:Notability. I regret deleting an article by a new user,, but this article is not ready for mainspace. Perhaps it can be wp:userfied while this person develops it.

If one removes all self-published sources, not enough is left here to make an article.  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  14:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * response - I'm working on the sources issue. Will have the article updated within 24 hours to better comply with policies. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inaffziger (talk • contribs) 19:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment It seems that the topic passes GNG and thus it might be better to tag the article with multiple issues. Dmatteng (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Article Updated - I just updated the article and added a number of third-party sources. I believe this addresses the criticisms raised about cited sources. Please let me know if anyone sees further problems that need to be addressed.


 * Also, please explain what is GNG, and do I need to do anything about that? (referring to Dmatteng comment above) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inaffziger (talk • contribs) 21:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * GNG - General Notability Guidelines (most probably :)). Please sign your posts. If you need further help, you may chat in real-time on the IRC. Type "WP:IRC" in the Wikipedia search for more information.Dmatteng (talk) 17:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

 “Japan in pioneering partnership to fund global health research”, by Andrew Jack, Financial Times, May 30, 2013 “Japan and Partners Team Up to Tackle Neglected Diseases”, by Dina Fine Maron, Scientific American, November 8, 2013 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=japan-and-partners-team) “Joining the Fight Against Neglected Diseases”, Science magazine, June 7, 2013, Volume 340, p.1148 “An Audience with … Tachi Yamada”, by Asher Mullard, Nature magazine, September 2013, Volume 12, p.658 "Japanese drugmakers get serious about tackling dengue", by Daisaku Yamasaki and Sadachika Watanabe, NIKKEI Asian Review, 09/16/2014 (http://asia.nikkei.com/Tech-Science/Science/Japanese-drugmakers-get-serious-about-tackling-dengue), accessed on 09/30/2014 “Give and It Shall Be Given unto You”, The Economist, November 16–22, 2013, p.72 “Japanese Universities Look to Swat Malaria Bug”, NIKKEI Asian Review, January 30, 2014 (http://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/20140130-The-wages-of-growth/Tech-Science/Japanese-universities-look-to-swat-malaria-bug), accessed on 09/30/2014 Looking forward to any feedback in further changes to the article are recommended. Thanks! Inaffziger (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)inaffziger 
 * Sources to focus on in review Per above, the article had been updated with additional sources and better adherence to those sources. In review, please focus on the following sources (all uninterested third party, some peer reviewed) to establish notability:
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.