Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Leveraged Capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Global Leveraged Capital

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has a single reference (from a good source, mind you), but that source cites the company is forming another firm...and including that, the company seems not overly notable.-- Syrthiss (talk) 14:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

(note that if this discussion ends up with delete, should probably make sure the redirects get cleared as well)



GLC is part of the new trend of investment banking shifting to boutiques and alternative firms.

Boutique trend: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123379537765150203.html

Citadel: http://www.iddmagazine.com/news/-192797-1.html

Understand the idea about notability, but this is the parent of a multipronged finance company and represents a major trend in the industry.


 * Weak delete Borderline case, but there does not as yet appear to be the depth of coverage necessary to support inclusion of this article, as spelled out in WP:N and WP:CORP. --Jayron32. talk . contribs  16:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note Articles for deletion/GLC Advisors & Co. - Dank (push to talk) 18:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 18:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete . Fails WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.