Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Monitoring Report (World Bank)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  20:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Global Monitoring Report (World Bank)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article confuses notability of poverty with notability of the report on poverty. While the report's results are widely discussed, the report itself is not covered in any detail; in fact, not a single secondary source bothers to report its title. Huon (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm not seeing anything better. SwisterTwister   talk  01:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   18:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable, numerous in depth coverage over many years in major newspapers, magazines, books and so on. Not sure what you mean by "not a single secondary source bothers to report its title" - a quick google news search of "Global Monitoring Report" shows hundreds of results, including:, , , , , etc etc, and in other sources, e.g.: . Try searching without the (World Bank) part in quotations. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.