Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Professional Wrestling Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete, but please improve referencing in the article. W.marsh 21:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Global Professional Wrestling Alliance


non notable group. formed in 2006. Rwqw9 06:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - 38 non-wiki ghits, fails WP:CORP. MER-C 09:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Ewxo 10:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 03:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Aaru Bui  DII 03:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --- Paulley 10:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no reason for deletion --Voievod 22:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable indyBooyakaDell 01:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Japan is a highly visible contributor to professional wrestling, and this alliance is Japan's version of the old NWA in America. For this reason it is notable, and further I would suggest this nomination has been made in bad faith. Curse of Fenric 09:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Far more notable organisation than 90% of American independent promotions. A proper Google search  returns 11,500 non-Wiki hits, and this does not even take into account that it is a Japanese organisation and therefore a large number of search results will not appear due to the search being in English.  81.151.42.96 17:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Indrian 17:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This does not fail WP:CORP, as alleged above.   and  clearly illustrate this point.  Also professional wrestling is covered in newspaper and magazine articles in Japan on a daily basis. 81.151.42.96 17:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The above comment shows without a doubt that those who have supported the deletion know very little about pro wrestling. Recommend an executive decision to retain the article (if I may!). Curse of Fenric 20:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It would also be beneficial if people took time to familiarise themselves with the Afd procedures specifically the point which states: The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments. Notability has been proved, this article should be kept. 81.151.42.96 08:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I see nothing wrong. Govvy 15:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.