Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Punctuality Index


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Global Punctuality Index

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is some kind of original research and is not quite clear what the article is about. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Delete I cannot understand the subject of this article. Looks like an essay to meCTAГЛИT (talk) 22:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Importance The subject is emerging and very important. Like UNDP created Human Development Index and World Economic Forum developed Global Competitiveness Index and World Bank is publishing Doing Business Index every year, Global Punctuality Index intends to developed measuring punctuality of different countries and rank them in ascending order on scale of 100, the most punctual country. As the subject is new, the concept is floated by Dr. Sapovadia after initial research, seek feedback from other economists and social scientists to make unique contribution to save trillions of man hour lost due to lack of punctuality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sapovadia (talk • contribs) 04:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Delete Violates WP:OR. Article attributes idea to Dr. Vrajlal Sapovadia, and article was created by user Sapovadia. Strong likelihood that this article was created to promote original ideas: Wikipedia is not for publishing or promoting your scheme to make the world a happy place. No evidence of third parties discussing the index in reliable sources. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.