Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Reach Partners (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Global Reach Partners
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

lack of encyclopaedic notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harveyjakes (talk • contribs)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:09, 25 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: My searches find passing quotations from people associated with the company and mention relating to sponsorships, but I am seeing nothing to contradict the 2011 AfD consensus and demonstrate notability, whether by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, references still fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 16:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.