Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Shop Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Global Shop Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable business software corp, unimproved since tagged in 2008 Kilopi (talk) 19:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP) company advertising on Wikipedia.  'References' are to routine coverage of startup financing and to a company profile.  "Global", shopping, and "solutions" in the business name --- how many more indicia of non-notability can you get? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: lack of action to improve this article shows only that the principals of WP:BEFORE have not been thoroughly followed and the name of the company as an indicator of non-notability is a new one on me. (You could make the same point about "International", "Business", and "Machines" but it wouldn't change that company's notability.) Coverage is thin but notability is not a competition. - Dravecky (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Smerdis of Tlön. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - The coverage is too thin to meet WP:CORP. Of the two Houston Chronicle refs listed in the article, I was able to find the online copy for one; Exports are rare bright spot for falling dollar, which is a passing mention.  The title of the other article implies coverage about raising capital which is routine business coverage.  I can find lots of press releases and they are mentioned in articles like this.  What I cannot find is significant coverage about the company that would be sufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per all of the above. Katarighe (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.