Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Thermostat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Direct air capture. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Global Thermostat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

no evidence this is a notable company on it's own - it's all PR and basic announcements. I suggest a deletion and redirect to the founders article. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per the nominator. No evidence of notability.  Ken Tony  Shall we discuss? 15:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Direct air capture. Even if they are notable, it is pointless having a standalone page that says no more than "it exists" when there is substantially more information in the redirect target.  This company probably is notable – the fact that it has deals with Coca-Cola and Exxon Mobil is enough to suggest that, but see this review of the company last year by Bloomberg if you're not convinced, also this article from GreenBiz.  Because of that, the title and history should be retained because someone is going to write a proper article at some stage. SpinningSpark 10:56, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.