Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Traveler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  00:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Global Traveler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I find numerous trivial mentions of this magazine in travel-related publications, but mostly press releases. Of the two non-press-release sources given in the article, only one shows any coverage of significance, and it's a niche trade publication. I'd say this almost qualifies as WP:CSD speedy delete but I'm uncertain, so I'm nominating it here. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources, no notability... --Randykitty (talk) 13:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete We have no good standards for consumer magazines, unless there are major prizes, which may be too high a standard. Furthermore, I consider  this one of the areas where  the GNG is almost irrelevant as there are almost no places where there would be a relevant source that would be trivial or PR--or be a report of such a prize.  I use the guide of whether it is a leading national magazine in its subject field. According to the article's ref 1, it has a circ of 100,000. Conde Nash Traveler has 800,000,  DGG ( talk ) 15:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.