Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global concrete polishing institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Global concrete polishing institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet the organization notability guidelines Also seems a tad promotional as the page was created by a user claiming to be the director of this organization which is a conflict of interest issue(uncertain if they are paid for that position)  My search could not find any sources other than related websites and a few press releases. 331dot (talk) 11:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete and I'd say a "tad" promotional is very forgiving. The whole thing is a WP:Coatrack by User:Proper education (temporarily blocked) to promote himself and his utterly non-notable concrete polishing "institute." Well, something's being polished here, and it ain't concrete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess by "tad" promotional I meant that it wouldn't meet the G11 speedy delete bar IMO. 331dot (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable organisation.Seaweed (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and promotional. --Lockley (talk) 03:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.