Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globalist Manifesto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''speedily deleted as a copyright vio. TN X Man 17:36, 24 June 2011 (UTC)'''

Globalist Manifesto

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A google search of this neologism presents multiple, undefinable meanings to this phrase. This article presents one scholar's meaning of the word, and does so in a manner not consistent with WP:NPOV. I cannot see how this article can be re-written to make in in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Singularity42 (talk) 14:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Keep Obviously, I am just a beginner on this stuff. And I hope to make this my first article published in the Wikipedia, if the community will allow me. I am a doctoral student in Public Administration and encountered Globalist Manifesto in my review of literature concerning the global external environment of a city which is a subject of my study, which influences their outcome based on System Theory.In fact, their local industry was affected by the global events, one of them is globalization. I googled Globalist Manifesto, deep search to be accurate, and it gives me 16,500 results which probably speak of the relative weight of the concept. I must admit though that I was not able to read all the results listed by Google but the reason why I picked the discussion of Avner Falk, to start the article, because he seem to be credible and his book is being managed by Google Books, which somehow add to the credibility. Because Wikipedia is a reader - edited encyclopedia, I am expecting that people who read the other articles about Globalist Manifesto will try to contribute and improve the article. Frankly, I have no idea to where the article will lead and whats the final form and substance of the article, but, maybe, it is better to start with an article written by a scholar and see how it will progress through time. For one, I still have to learn a lot of Wikipedia system. Sorry for my naivety on Wikipedia system and I wish to learn slowly but surely. Thank you. respectfully your.12jewish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12jewish (talk • contribs) 15:05, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.


 * Delete, weakly, or perhaps move to the actual subject. I find this article confusing.  It actually seems to be about a book, Islamic Terror: Conscious and Unconscious Motives.  To the extent that this article mentions the title "Globalist Manifesto", it seems to cast it in a harsh light: Yet the idealist Globalist Manifesto, created in the Philippines, is a paean to peace and prosperity. It paints an idealized picture of our world. It is wishful thinking at its most glaring. While I haven't formed an opinion about whether the book it's actually about could support its own article or not, an article titled "Globalist Manifesto" ought to tell us more about a Globalist Manifesto and what it says.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Keep. Hi Ihcoyc. Good day to you. Regarding your opinion: "an article titled "Globalist Manifesto" ought to tell us more about a Globalist Manifesto and what it says". We agree with you. Maybe one future reader or contributor of the proposed Wikipedia article Globalist Manifesto may soon post something about the ideas expounded by the manifesto. Definitely not now because the article has just been published, but in the future. I have seen lots of articles in Wikipedia which started short and stub but eventually evolved through time. With this observation, we think that we may decide to keep the article to let the others the opportunity to contribute to the article and pretty soon we will be able to see in the article what the Globalist Manifesto is saying, as you rightly pointed out. Regards. 12jewish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12jewish (talk • contribs) 16:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: You are free to reply to other users and make comments. But please only !vote once. Singularity42 (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a neologism that is mainly promoted by one source. Not notable enough for WP. Angryapathy (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyright violation. See -- almost the entire text of this article consists of seven consecutive sentences quoted from Avner Falk's book (see page 45). Although the book is cited in this Wikipedia article, the quote is not identified as a quote, and even if it were, Falk's argument is very difficult to follow here in this Wikipedia article where it has been removed from its context. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.