Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globalization and the Demolition of Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Globalization and the Demolition of Society

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A few reasons why I am proposing this for deletion: (1) This article is basically a book review, and in it's current state is non-encyclopedic.. (2) Author does have a Wikipedia article, but the book is published by a vanity house that has only appeared to published this book from gsearch results. I'm reading WP:NBOOK and looking through other gsearch results, and while I do see a few reviews out there on some blogs, I don't see any coverage on a major review site (e.g. NY Times), so it doesn't seem to meet criteria (1), and it doesn't meet (2-5) either. PROD declined. Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only does this not merit a wikipedia article, but I also noticed this entry was added shortly after the article's creator set up a lengthy article about the author as well. (Which I'll be nominating for deletion shortly.) Fails WP:NBOOK. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete Both - it's Blatant Advertising, I'm afraid. No attempt at independent references. Please take this as my support for deleting the article about the author too. Well spotted, Tokyogirl79. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete both - this and Dennis Loo - self promotion of a not independently notable person. Off2riorob (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.