Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globalocal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Globalocal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This looks like a non-notable neologism. Note that I removed these examples which I think supports my point. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:34, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, brief search didn't find any evidence that this term is used with any regularity. Also, WP is not a dictionary. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NEO, specifically: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." Also seems promotional. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dictionary definition of a non-notable neologism. --Michig (talk) 12:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.