Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of characters in Rayman. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Globox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, tag present for over 1 year with no corrective action taken. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and. Unscintillating (talk) 13:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)]

Unsourced article, no sign that the character has notability independent of the Rayman series of video games. Sergecross73  msg me   15:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of characters in Rayman - Heh, I remember Globox. However, he's not an independently notable character, and the article is completely unsourced, so a merger is not appropriate. This is a very plausible search term, however; so the aforementioned redirect is the best course of action. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 21:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Crtew (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not surprised, but in my opinion, this AfD is entirely valid, even if the others weren't. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 15:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Per Lukeno and my comments above. Lacks notability, but does seem like a plausible search term, and the "list of characters" article for the series seems to be the best redirect target. Sergecross73   msg me   15:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per above. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.