Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Glog


Not only is this a 'confusing' article (which by itself isnt a criteria for deletion), but its a blatant spamvertisement by gloto.com about um, something, which doenst quite make sense. Non-notable/spam. delete. timecop 05:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete uh huh. Danny Lilithborne 05:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 06:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Glogg, which is more notable and doesn't taste like Spam. Tubezone 06:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Eusebeus 14:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - blog-related neologism. blog-related. non-notable, vanity, whatever. - Femmina 20:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. Or redirect as suggested by Tubezone. Linuxaurus 16:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.