Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glokal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 15:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Glokal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

non notable neologism Wuh  Wuz  Dat  17:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of huge theses. Translation here. Syrthiss (talk) 17:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Based on the translation above, it appears to be the text of a script. If not original research, then there's an issue of reprinting it here and whether it infringes copyrights. With the partial translation, that'll be hard to prove. However, unless the term is backed up with independent (English, preferably) reliable sources, it needs to go. —C.Fred (talk) 17:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have seen the term "glocalism" used by some globalization commentators like Thomas Friedman as an esoteric political phenomenon, but that term is not prevalent enough to establish notability. This article under discussion might be a foreign version of the same thing, maybe not. Either way, can't establish notability in English WP without English sources. Doomsdayer520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - this is something that the malaysian and indonesian projects are inflicted with regularly - and the context of that issue - malay or indonesian language material dumped into WP en - is something that should be considered, rather than allowing credence at face value. Also there seems a lack of understanding from the comments above - I think the user name (from the rusty memory of the current editor) is totally unsuitable and potentially blockable :) SatuSuro 04:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - as something that shows (1) no understanding of what wikipedia is or is not (dumping essays?) (2) duplicating material already on en wikipedia (see below) (3) mixing of language usage in text and potentially contentious POV items in text SatuSuro 04:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  —SatuSuro 04:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  —SatuSuro 04:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. English Wikipedia has an article on Glocalisation, Glocal Forum, and Glocals.com. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 04:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.